Connect with us

News

Emefiele’s Naira notes redesign brought untold economic hardship to public– EFCC witness

A Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC), Chinelo Eneanya, on Thursday told a n Abuja high court, that former Central Bank of Nigeria Governor, Godwin Emefiele’s Naira notes redesign brought economic hardship to Nigerians.

Eneanya, an investigator with the EFCC was the seventh prosecution witness (PW7)in Emefiele ‘s trial on the redesign of naira notes of N1000, N500 and N200.

Being led in evidence by the prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo , SAN the witness told the court that from the video evidence tendered in court, the new naira notes redesign policy injured the public.

He said he was in court to give evidence on the investigation carried out in this case and their findings.

When asked whether the commission’s investigation covered the allegations in the case?, he said:we investigated the allegations that the conduct of the defendant caused injury to the people.

‘It has direct bearing on how or the effect of the naira redesign severely affected the public.

“We looked at the documentary, electronic and audio visual evidence of the effect of the naira redesign on the public.”

The Prosecution then tendered the documents, the audio- visual device and the certificate of identification in evidence.

Additionally, the certified copy of bundle of documents tagged delivery notes and notice of meeting was admitted.

Further, the bill of settlement in respect of the redesigned naira notes, 2022 and 2023 were tendered and marked as evidence.

The defendant’s counsel, Olulekun Ojo, SAN did not object to the tendering of the documents.

Six video (audio visual) evidence were played in the court, there are from News Central, Channel Television News, TVC News and Arise News .

When asked what was the commission’s findings on the video shown, the witness answered:”it showed that there were widespread frustration and difficulties from the public in meeting their daily needs and their businesses were equally affected.

” On the investigation conducted, we found that board members and committee of governors of CBN interviewed got to know about the approval of the president after, it was approved. “

The witness said in the cause of the investigation, the electronic evidence shown was to know whether there were any impact on the members of the public.

He added from the introduction of the new redesigned N1000, N500 and N200 notes by the CBN and to see the level of the hardship on the public.

” In the cause of the investigation, we set out to determine how the laws on change of policy on Naira redesign was applied or abused”.

Ojo, however, objected when the witness wanted to speak on the Supreme court ‘s judgment on naira redesign notes.

He said no witness can give evidence on a public document, he did not brought about.

Responding, Oyedepo said the video evidence, the party who tendered a document should be the only one to speak on it.

He added so that it does not amount to dumping it on the court. He cited authorities.

He said PW7 investigated the allegations and should not to be said to be hearsay. He cited authorities also.

” The witness has not given evidence to vary or alter the findings of the Supreme court. The objection is premature.”

Justice Maryann Anenih overruled the objection saying that the argument was about giving evidence on a document and dumping evidence on the court.

” The witness can go on and only give evidence which links to the document. “

Oyedepo asked the witness if the defendant was interviewed by EFCC, he said: “ yes”

He tendered in evidence the extra judicial statements made by Emefiele to EFCC.

Oyedepo asked whether the defendant in the cause of investigation was confronted with the question whether the Board or governors approved the redesign?

” He was confronted and he wrote in his statement that he did not.”

Ojo asked for an adjournment for cross-examination of PW7.

The prosecution did not object .

Justice Anenih granted the application for adjournment in the interest of justice until Nov. 26.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Police Rescue 23 Kidnap Victims In FCT, Arrest 14 Suspects

The FCT Police Command’s Scorpion Squad, have announced the arrest of fourteen suspected kidnappers and the rescue of twenty-three victims, all foreign nationals, from captivity.

A statement by the FCT Police Public Relations Officer Josephine Adeh, showed that the intelligence-led operation took place at about 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday, 22nd October 2025, at Angwan Adamu Ruga Fulani Zone B, Riverside, Ado Mararaba, Nasarawa State.

“In a major breakthrough against kidnapping and human trafficking, operatives of the FCT Police Command’s Scorpion Squad, have successfully arrested fourteen (14) suspected kidnappers and rescued twenty-three (23) victims, all foreign nationals, from captivity,” Adeh said in the statement on Friday.

The operation followed a report indicating that several foreign nationals had been lured into Nigeria under the pretext of lucrative job offers and upon arrival, they were held hostage by their abductors, who demanded ransom payments from their families via WhatsApp and other online platforms.

FCT police authorities said preliminary investigation revealed that the syndicate is coordinated by one Abubakar Jigiba, a transnational criminal kingpin with known residences in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Mali, and Nigeria while his younger brother, Sougule Zoubere, handles the recruitment, kidnapping, and smuggling of victims from Mali into Nigeria, where they are detained pending ransom payments.

“Further investigations revealed that the victims were trafficked into the country through illegal border routes in a journey lasting about three days. They were subsequently confined in two fortified two-bedroom apartments under inhumane conditions.

“Acting on actionable digital and reconstructive intelligence, the Scorpion Squad traced the hideout to the above address where a total number of twenty-three (23) victims, comprising fourteen (14) males, eight (8) females, and one (1) child, all unhurt, except one who sustained a minor ear injury and has been taken to the National Hospital, Abuja, for medical attention,” the police said.

Continue Reading

News

Court Stops 2025 PDP’s National Convention

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja has stopped the planned 2025 National Convention of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) until the party complies with the statutory requirements of the party, the Constitution and the Electoral Act are met.

Delivering judgement in a suit filed by three aggrieved members of the party, the judge also restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from accepting report on the outcome of any national convention of the party without following the due process of the law as well as its guidelines and regulations.

The judge held that INEC is not entitled to give effect to the convention a party not done in accordance with the Constitution, Electoral Act and the guidelines/regulations of political parties.

The plaintiffs instituted the suit seeking to stop the planned November 15 and 16, 2025 National Convention of PDP scheduled for Ibadan in Oyo State where new National Officers are expected to be elected on the ground of breach of the party’s Constitution.

The nine defendants are, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), PDP, Samuel Anyanwu, National Secretary of the party, Umar Bature, National Organizing Secretary of the party, National Working Committee (NWC) and National Executive Committee (NEC) of the party, Ambassador Umar Iliya Damagum, Ali Odefa and Emmanuel Ogidi

Continue Reading

News

Nnamdi Kanu files fresh motion, asks court to strike out all charges

The detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has filed a fresh motion before the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking the dismissal of all charges against him and his immediate release.

In the motion dated October 30, 2025, and titled “Motion on Notice and Written Address in Support,” Kanu argued that there is no valid charge against him under any existing law in Nigeria. He said the charges currently before the court are “a nullity ab initio for want of any extant legal foundation.”

The IPOB leader, who is representing himself, filed the motion under Sections 1(3), 6(6)(b), and 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution, the Evidence Act 2011, and the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022.

He maintained that the prosecution relied on repealed and non-existent laws, including the Customs and Excise Management Act (CEMA), which was repealed by the Nigeria Customs Service Act 2023, and the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013, repealed by the TPPA 2022.

Kanu said the reliance on such repealed laws violates Section 36(12) of the Constitution, which prohibits trial for an offence not defined under an existing law. He therefore urged the court to strike out the charges in their entirety, insisting they do not constitute any offence known to law.

Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in FRN v. Kanu (SC/CR/1361/2022), he argued that lower courts are bound to take judicial notice of repealed laws under Section 122 of the Evidence Act 2011, adding that failure to do so renders all proceedings void.

Kanu also contended that the counts against him were allegedly committed in Kenya, in violation of Section 76(1)(d)(iii) of the TPPA 2022, which requires validation by a Kenyan court before such acts can be tried in Nigeria. He said this omission nullifies the court’s extraterritorial jurisdiction and breaches Article 7(2) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

He further maintained that under Sections 1(3) and 36(12) of the Constitution, any law or judicial act inconsistent with the Constitution is void. He cited previous court decisions such as Aoko v. Fagbemi (1961) 1 All NLR 400 and FRN v. Ifegwu (2003) 15 NWLR (Pt 842) 113, where convictions based on non-existent laws were nullified.

Kanu urged the court to direct the prosecution to respond to his motion strictly on points of law within three days and to deliver a ruling on or before November 4, 2025.

He stated that his application raises only constitutional and legal questions derived from existing laws and therefore does not require an affidavit.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending